This past weekend, we had a 5 year old boy come with his mom to stay 2 nights. I'd been around him before, but apparently I wasn't prepared for him to stay here. Those of you that know me, know that my house probably looks like a lot of fun to most kids. I have remote controlled cars, planes, pinball machines, slot machines and other things that kids like to get their hands on. The kid that came this weekend went beyond bugging me to handle my stuff. After being told numerous times by numerous people that if it wasn't his, don't touch it, he still managed to do some things that were way out of line. Saturday morning, he took $140.00 out of a ladies purse that was also staying here. I was told that he likes to give money to other kids so they'll be his friend. For some reason, he turned the temperature control to OFF on the hot water heater. At least he's into conservation. Four of the batteries to my satelite radio were missing. The remotes to my vehicles were turned on and left in places I hadn't left them. I think you get the picture. So before we went to bed Saturday night, I stood before the group and asked how we were going to keep him from doing a repeat performance? His mom didn't like that, and took him downstairs. Was I supposed to kid proof my house before they arrived or should the mom have a better handle on her son? He is a little hellion. When around him before, everyone had to watch him. One thing I wonder about is why don't parents of kids bring some of their toys with them, taking the strain off me and my toys.
I know it isn't just today's generation that is raising buttheads for kids. Mine weren't perfect, but I can tell you when we took them places, they minded. When I was young, we got reprimanded for butting into a conversation. We were taught to say please and thank you, excuse me and to ask if we could touch something. There was a saying that should be brought back, too. "Kids are to be seen, but not heard." And what's up with kids calling their parents by their first names??
Perhaps the dumbing down of society is showing it's ugly face when it comes to raising kids. Hillary Clinton said many years ago that it takes a village to raise a child. I guess she was speaking to how kids are being raised today. There are single parent homes everywhere, not just in the ghetto. Not sure how that pertains to where I live 'cuz I barely speak to my neighbors. Not sure they'd go for watching them.
Big Dogg out!
Monday, November 26, 2012
Friday, June 15, 2012
Go Home, Illegals!
On this very June 15th, 2012, President Barrack Obama has decided to stop deporting and grant work permits to younger illegal immigrants. This decision could affect as many as 800,000 immigrants. You have to be younger than 30 and have arrived here before age 16. You can't have a criminal history, you must have graduated from high school or have a GED or served in the military.
As far as them proving that they've been through school or served in the military, heck, I can get a piece of paper showing I'm a doctor or am qualified to teach school. It's like buying a gun. You just have to know the right people! Anyone that wants to can get one.
Are we stupid here or what? He's pandering to all of those folks coming across the border south of us and their relatives already here. Obama must be hurting for votes 'cuz why else would he do this? I'd be willing to wager a small amount that he's feeling some heat from Mitt in the polls. Obama obviously doesn't feel heat when it comes to them taking his job. I do. The illegals aren't going after the jobs at the top of companies, they're painting and cleaning houses, mowing yards all while living 10 to a one bedroom apartment!
I know Obama losing my vote won't keep him awake at night. He'll pick one up in south LA. This little move might just backfire on him. There are a lot of folks in this country that are tired of losing their jobs to someone that has little to nothing invested in this country.
All I can say now is.....run, Mitt, run!
Big Dog out!
As far as them proving that they've been through school or served in the military, heck, I can get a piece of paper showing I'm a doctor or am qualified to teach school. It's like buying a gun. You just have to know the right people! Anyone that wants to can get one.
Are we stupid here or what? He's pandering to all of those folks coming across the border south of us and their relatives already here. Obama must be hurting for votes 'cuz why else would he do this? I'd be willing to wager a small amount that he's feeling some heat from Mitt in the polls. Obama obviously doesn't feel heat when it comes to them taking his job. I do. The illegals aren't going after the jobs at the top of companies, they're painting and cleaning houses, mowing yards all while living 10 to a one bedroom apartment!
I know Obama losing my vote won't keep him awake at night. He'll pick one up in south LA. This little move might just backfire on him. There are a lot of folks in this country that are tired of losing their jobs to someone that has little to nothing invested in this country.
All I can say now is.....run, Mitt, run!
Big Dog out!
Sunday, June 10, 2012
3D Movies
One thing I hate to come off as is is a complainer. (When older people get together it's what we seem to do.) I find myself questioning things. Why is the price of gas so high here vs. other places in the country? It isn't 'cuz I remember many moons ago when the price of a gallon of gas was 19 cents compared to $4.55 now. Everything has gone up in price. But $4.55??
Going to a movie is one thing that has gone up in price. We went to see Prometheus in 3D IMAX the other night. Lord knows there'd been plenty of hype prior, so we bought our tickets online, not wanting to stand in line at the box office. Sure enough, the theatre filled up. It was time to put our glasses on.
I guess a lot of what this movie's story was about was lost on me. Apparently it was about where the aliens came from in the Alien series. I went to see a movie and be entertained by this story. After we all got in the car, not one of the 4 of us gave this movie more than a 2 out of 4 stars. For starters, we all questioned why it was in 3D. Nothing jumped out at you, which to me is the reason why you want to see something in 3D, yes? You want to get the feeling that you're attached in a minor way to the action on the screen, not just sitting in your seat like a normal movie in 2D. That's why we shelled out $18.00!
Having been to Disneyland, Disney World, Universal Studios on both coasts, MGM Studios and numerous 3D IMAX theatres, I know what we're being fed in the theatres we see movies in can be better. There wasn't one time when the audience jumped or responded together 'cuz something on the screen startled us. Not once. You won't say that after going to Universal Studios and watching Terminator 2 in 3D! Perhaps crowds are going 'cuz we all hope this one will finally give us the 3D we've been waiting for.
The only 3D movie I did like was Avatar. I haven't seen them all, but now I'll be content with just seeing movies in 2D. That is, until someone tells me that some movie has finally done what they do every day at Disneyland or Universal Studios.......make me jump!
Big Dogg....out!
Going to a movie is one thing that has gone up in price. We went to see Prometheus in 3D IMAX the other night. Lord knows there'd been plenty of hype prior, so we bought our tickets online, not wanting to stand in line at the box office. Sure enough, the theatre filled up. It was time to put our glasses on.
I guess a lot of what this movie's story was about was lost on me. Apparently it was about where the aliens came from in the Alien series. I went to see a movie and be entertained by this story. After we all got in the car, not one of the 4 of us gave this movie more than a 2 out of 4 stars. For starters, we all questioned why it was in 3D. Nothing jumped out at you, which to me is the reason why you want to see something in 3D, yes? You want to get the feeling that you're attached in a minor way to the action on the screen, not just sitting in your seat like a normal movie in 2D. That's why we shelled out $18.00!
Having been to Disneyland, Disney World, Universal Studios on both coasts, MGM Studios and numerous 3D IMAX theatres, I know what we're being fed in the theatres we see movies in can be better. There wasn't one time when the audience jumped or responded together 'cuz something on the screen startled us. Not once. You won't say that after going to Universal Studios and watching Terminator 2 in 3D! Perhaps crowds are going 'cuz we all hope this one will finally give us the 3D we've been waiting for.
The only 3D movie I did like was Avatar. I haven't seen them all, but now I'll be content with just seeing movies in 2D. That is, until someone tells me that some movie has finally done what they do every day at Disneyland or Universal Studios.......make me jump!
Big Dogg....out!
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Why vote? A question I'm asking myself more and more. For those of you that vote, you might care more about this issue than those of you that don't vote. Even though this vote had something to do with an area of life that many of us don't take part in, it still touches us all. I'm talking about the initiative to privatize liquor sales and dismantle all state-run liquor stores.
After 2 tries, the voters finally said it's time to take the State of Washington out of the booze business. Something I think should have happened a long time ago. What's happening as I write this is "The Washington Association for Substance Abuse and Violence Prevention" has filed suit and is forking over dough to pay for an attorney to argue before the Washington State Supreme Court. The reason they're doing this, and I quote a KOMO.com article again, "the initiative violates state rules requiring measures to address only one subject, because it includes a provision to set aside $10 million for public safety." Never mind that that group is a "landlord to a state-owned liquor store in Cowlitz County." Need a say more? Another group, "the unions whose members stand to lose their jobs if the initiative is implemented also filed suit in a similar lawsuit in King County Superior Court. That case was put on hold in January, pending the Cowlitz case."
I guess what I don't get is why did we need the state to control when we can or can't buy booze in the first place? Is it because it's booze? Were we just being protected from ourselves? (I remember a time when you couldn't buy meat on Sunday in this state. Guess we weren't supposed to have a spur of the moment BBQ on Sunday. We didn't need that steak anyway!) Some of those ads before the last vote kind of hinted at that. Kids were used as part of the reason why we should keep things as it is. We all know kids can get booze way easier if it's in Safeway or QFC. No. Kids will see booze as they walk through the store, unlike how it is now. You can't even be in the store if your under 21. They better ban everyone under the age from seeing booze ads on TV, in magazines and on billboards. I think the State of Washington relaized it had a cash cow and didn't want to give it up. When I asked those behind the counter, that I've seen time and time again, what they plan on doing now, almost all of them told me they were only working there for the benefits. They all had other jobs! Some owned businesses.
We don't have state run gas stations or state run meat stores, so why booze? Imagine the uproar if tomorrow the governor announced a news conference and at this news conference she made the following annoucement. "Starting July 5th, Safeway, QFC, Wal-Mart and other food stores will no longer be allowed to sell any kind of meat. Be it in packages for sandwiches or from the butcher for BBQing, the only way the public in this state can get it's meat is from a state run store." The main reason would be because we need to be protected from ruthless meat sellers. Those sellers that would sell us meat past it's pull date or meat with pink slime in it. Oh the shame of it all. There won't be any state run meat stores anytime soon, so don't get your shorts in a huff.
Bottom line in this story is, the state will still collect it's taxes. That's the bad news. The good news is, those of us that like to have some whiskey or vodka in the house, can now buy it whenever we want, assuming stores that stay open all night, like some Safeway's, will get it at a cheaper price. Costco and Sam's Club will sell it, too. Hopefully I don't have to buy a case of whiskey. Put the next round on my tab!
Until we type again......
After 2 tries, the voters finally said it's time to take the State of Washington out of the booze business. Something I think should have happened a long time ago. What's happening as I write this is "The Washington Association for Substance Abuse and Violence Prevention" has filed suit and is forking over dough to pay for an attorney to argue before the Washington State Supreme Court. The reason they're doing this, and I quote a KOMO.com article again, "the initiative violates state rules requiring measures to address only one subject, because it includes a provision to set aside $10 million for public safety." Never mind that that group is a "landlord to a state-owned liquor store in Cowlitz County." Need a say more? Another group, "the unions whose members stand to lose their jobs if the initiative is implemented also filed suit in a similar lawsuit in King County Superior Court. That case was put on hold in January, pending the Cowlitz case."
I guess what I don't get is why did we need the state to control when we can or can't buy booze in the first place? Is it because it's booze? Were we just being protected from ourselves? (I remember a time when you couldn't buy meat on Sunday in this state. Guess we weren't supposed to have a spur of the moment BBQ on Sunday. We didn't need that steak anyway!) Some of those ads before the last vote kind of hinted at that. Kids were used as part of the reason why we should keep things as it is. We all know kids can get booze way easier if it's in Safeway or QFC. No. Kids will see booze as they walk through the store, unlike how it is now. You can't even be in the store if your under 21. They better ban everyone under the age from seeing booze ads on TV, in magazines and on billboards. I think the State of Washington relaized it had a cash cow and didn't want to give it up. When I asked those behind the counter, that I've seen time and time again, what they plan on doing now, almost all of them told me they were only working there for the benefits. They all had other jobs! Some owned businesses.
We don't have state run gas stations or state run meat stores, so why booze? Imagine the uproar if tomorrow the governor announced a news conference and at this news conference she made the following annoucement. "Starting July 5th, Safeway, QFC, Wal-Mart and other food stores will no longer be allowed to sell any kind of meat. Be it in packages for sandwiches or from the butcher for BBQing, the only way the public in this state can get it's meat is from a state run store." The main reason would be because we need to be protected from ruthless meat sellers. Those sellers that would sell us meat past it's pull date or meat with pink slime in it. Oh the shame of it all. There won't be any state run meat stores anytime soon, so don't get your shorts in a huff.
Bottom line in this story is, the state will still collect it's taxes. That's the bad news. The good news is, those of us that like to have some whiskey or vodka in the house, can now buy it whenever we want, assuming stores that stay open all night, like some Safeway's, will get it at a cheaper price. Costco and Sam's Club will sell it, too. Hopefully I don't have to buy a case of whiskey. Put the next round on my tab!
Until we type again......
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Gridlock.
A good friend of mine recently told me that Ballard will soon gain another 1,200 apartments/condos. He should know 'cuz he's developed a few apartment buildings around town and currently has his office in one in Ballard. To say the least, he keeps up on that stuff. For those of you not familiar with Ballard, Market Street is the main corridor through Ballard (east and west) and 15th takes you north and south. Most of the new housing units will be built along Market on one side or other of 15th. In fact from 14th NW down to around 24th going east and west and no more than a block off Market north and south. One of his former properties is currently being leveled and will soon be part of the 1,200 new units. It sits on 15th NW which has No Parking on the west side in the morning from 7 - 9 and the same on the west side from 4 - 6 in the afternoon. I asked him where all the residents are going to park once those new units are available? He kind of chuckled and said over on 16th or on some other side street. I asked him why not under the building, to which he remarked that the City no longer requires developers to provide 1.4 parking spots, or whatever the current number is, per unit in off street parking. According to my friend, the City "assumes" developers will do that. Yeah, like I "assume" I'm going to win Lotto every time I play!
I've lived in Ballard/Greenwood for 60 years and have driven the streets since 1967. The only thing that's changed, when it comes to traffic, is there's more of it. We keep seeing more and more housing units being built, in Ballard and Greenwood, but nothing seems to be getting done about the higher amounts of cars trying to get in and out of Greenwood and Ballard. Greenwood Ave. is the main way south from 105th to 67th where it turns into Phinney and continues to The Zoo. It used to be 4 lanes. Not any more. Bike lanes on the sides, with a turn lane in the middle. Take 24th NW for instance. It's a main way in and out of Ballard for those of us that live on the west side. It used to be wide enough to have 2 lanes going north and south, all the way from 85th NW down to Market St. A good 3 mile stretch. We now have gridlock as you approach Market 'cuz there's a 2-way turn lane down the middle and a bike lane on either side. If you travel 85th east and west you still run in to parking on the north and south sides from 32nd NW all the way to 8th NW. The traffic pattern at 85th and 24th NW has gotten so heavy, with folks traveling west wanting to turn left and head south, that there should be a left turn lane or turn light to help that mess out. I'm not holding my breath on that one. (This corridor was once rated as having the highest number of accidents in the city.)
I guess I'm stuck like Chuck trying to figure out why so many new housing units are allowed to be built yet nothing is being done to handle the ever increasing amount of traffic. To my knowledge, there's been no law passed saying you can 't own a car and we both know that with the price of rent today, many times it takes 2 to make the rent, which could mean 2 cars per unit! Now I'll grant you that not everybody that will move into the soon to be built 1,200 units will own a car. Some will ride Metro, some will work from home and others will ride bikes. However many more cars we get will be too many more. That is, unless we do some thing NOW before another 1,200 + people decide they, too, like Ballard and Greenwood. I for one am not going to ride the bus or try and commute on my bike. My line of work requires a truck. Maybe we can put a toll on the streets and reduce traffic that way. It seems to be working on 520!
I've lived in Ballard/Greenwood for 60 years and have driven the streets since 1967. The only thing that's changed, when it comes to traffic, is there's more of it. We keep seeing more and more housing units being built, in Ballard and Greenwood, but nothing seems to be getting done about the higher amounts of cars trying to get in and out of Greenwood and Ballard. Greenwood Ave. is the main way south from 105th to 67th where it turns into Phinney and continues to The Zoo. It used to be 4 lanes. Not any more. Bike lanes on the sides, with a turn lane in the middle. Take 24th NW for instance. It's a main way in and out of Ballard for those of us that live on the west side. It used to be wide enough to have 2 lanes going north and south, all the way from 85th NW down to Market St. A good 3 mile stretch. We now have gridlock as you approach Market 'cuz there's a 2-way turn lane down the middle and a bike lane on either side. If you travel 85th east and west you still run in to parking on the north and south sides from 32nd NW all the way to 8th NW. The traffic pattern at 85th and 24th NW has gotten so heavy, with folks traveling west wanting to turn left and head south, that there should be a left turn lane or turn light to help that mess out. I'm not holding my breath on that one. (This corridor was once rated as having the highest number of accidents in the city.)
I guess I'm stuck like Chuck trying to figure out why so many new housing units are allowed to be built yet nothing is being done to handle the ever increasing amount of traffic. To my knowledge, there's been no law passed saying you can 't own a car and we both know that with the price of rent today, many times it takes 2 to make the rent, which could mean 2 cars per unit! Now I'll grant you that not everybody that will move into the soon to be built 1,200 units will own a car. Some will ride Metro, some will work from home and others will ride bikes. However many more cars we get will be too many more. That is, unless we do some thing NOW before another 1,200 + people decide they, too, like Ballard and Greenwood. I for one am not going to ride the bus or try and commute on my bike. My line of work requires a truck. Maybe we can put a toll on the streets and reduce traffic that way. It seems to be working on 520!
Friday, January 20, 2012
The War On Drugs
There's no question in my mind that we're losing the war on drugs. If we were really serious about fighting it, every car, all containers and each airplane would be searched as they set foot on our soil. Yes, all traffic would come to a halt, but we all know that drugs are arriving here daily and most aren't produced here. All we're doing is maintaining an effort to stop drugs. It's almost like a jobs program. Roughly ten percent of the drugs coming into this country are found. If your starting point guard only made ten percent of their shots or completed ten percent of their passes, they'd be cut from the team. But we accept ten percent success when it comes to eradicating drugs from the American public. Go figure. It's time we change how we fight this problem. You can't get rid of a recurring bladder infection by constantly taking meds for the symptoms. You have to look beyond the symptoms and see what's causing said infections and treat what's causing them. Instead of waiting for the drugs to get here, why not go and eradicate the problem where it begins?
I'm sorry if the people that grow the plants that produce the drugs that eventually come and kill our people rely solely on growing poppy plants for their livelihood. Not my problem. What is my problem is when some drug induced person mugs me when they're out of money. That's my problem. We had no problem invading Iraq, yes? The search for WMD was the reason given for our intrusion. Then we slipped into Afghanistan to try and find Bin Laden. Eventually he was found in neighboring Pakistan, which, by the way, we had no problem entering also. For all those years, billions and billions of dollars were spent and thousands of lives were lost looking for WMD and tracking down Bin Laden. (No WMD were ever found.)
My point here is this. If we're serious about getting rid of the drug problem, we go to where the drugs come from and eradicate the problem there. We didn't wait for Bin Laden to come here to take him out, we went to where we thought he was. Same thing can be said for ending the war on drugs. You with me or against me?
I'm sorry if the people that grow the plants that produce the drugs that eventually come and kill our people rely solely on growing poppy plants for their livelihood. Not my problem. What is my problem is when some drug induced person mugs me when they're out of money. That's my problem. We had no problem invading Iraq, yes? The search for WMD was the reason given for our intrusion. Then we slipped into Afghanistan to try and find Bin Laden. Eventually he was found in neighboring Pakistan, which, by the way, we had no problem entering also. For all those years, billions and billions of dollars were spent and thousands of lives were lost looking for WMD and tracking down Bin Laden. (No WMD were ever found.)
My point here is this. If we're serious about getting rid of the drug problem, we go to where the drugs come from and eradicate the problem there. We didn't wait for Bin Laden to come here to take him out, we went to where we thought he was. Same thing can be said for ending the war on drugs. You with me or against me?
Unsolved Crimes.
If it weren't for non-fiction crime books and true crime TV shows, I wouldn't read many books nor view much TV. In case you don't watch TV, there are a lot of shows on that profile real crimes and they're not always solved. I'm sure if you stop and think you can come up with a major crime that hasn't been solved where you live. In Seattle, the case of Tom Wales comes to mind for me. Thomas C. Wales was an American Federal Prosceutor and a gun control advocate. He was gunned down while on his computer at home on Octonber 11th, 2001. For more about Thomas, please click on this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_C._Wales.
This is one of those cold cases that will go unsolved for who knows how long. Someone knows something, but isn't talking. We've all heard about where Jimmy Hoffa is supposed to be buried. Perhaps if the right amount of money were offered, the right person would step forward. There are lots of cases like that. We've been conditioned to think that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I don't buy it. In my mind, the CIA had something to do with it. But we'll never know 'cuz those involved are taking what happened to their graves! Here's how I think we solve some of the crimes that haven't been solved.
How about we dedicate one channel on cable TV to constantly run Washingtons Most Wanted. Some days it shows unsolved cases. Once a week it airs America's Most Wanted. We could take some of the drug money that's seized and offer it up for rewards. You offer enough and maybe we find where Jimmy Hoffa is buried! Bottom line is, someone knows who killed him and where he's buried. The same goes for unsolved crimes where we live. Make the cases known to us and perhaps we can help solve them. What are we afraid of? Success?? I'm guessing someone knows who DB Cooper was, but they don't want to say anything. Wave some Benjamins around and just maybe one of these years we talk about good tasting turkey instead of how many years ago DB Cooper jumped from a plane as it left Seattle headed south to Portland.
This is one of those cold cases that will go unsolved for who knows how long. Someone knows something, but isn't talking. We've all heard about where Jimmy Hoffa is supposed to be buried. Perhaps if the right amount of money were offered, the right person would step forward. There are lots of cases like that. We've been conditioned to think that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I don't buy it. In my mind, the CIA had something to do with it. But we'll never know 'cuz those involved are taking what happened to their graves! Here's how I think we solve some of the crimes that haven't been solved.
How about we dedicate one channel on cable TV to constantly run Washingtons Most Wanted. Some days it shows unsolved cases. Once a week it airs America's Most Wanted. We could take some of the drug money that's seized and offer it up for rewards. You offer enough and maybe we find where Jimmy Hoffa is buried! Bottom line is, someone knows who killed him and where he's buried. The same goes for unsolved crimes where we live. Make the cases known to us and perhaps we can help solve them. What are we afraid of? Success?? I'm guessing someone knows who DB Cooper was, but they don't want to say anything. Wave some Benjamins around and just maybe one of these years we talk about good tasting turkey instead of how many years ago DB Cooper jumped from a plane as it left Seattle headed south to Portland.
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Gays
After the Christmas presents were opened and we'd all gotten a cup of tea or coffee, I found myself sitting in my parents living room with my 85 year old father and my youngest son's wife. I think she's 43. Somehow the conversation got around to a newspaper my dad had read and the picture that was on the front cover. I didn't see the picture, but I'd heard about it. An aircraft carrier had returned to one of the ports here and as a female officer came off the ship, she ran into another female and they kissed on the lips. My dad remarked that he was glad he saw that picture while reading the paper in the bathroom 'cuz it about made him throw up! I thought I knew what his problem with that pic was, but acted like I didn't. It didn't take long for him to let me know what bugged him about it!
Most of you can probably guess what a person 85 years old might say. (Perhaps I should tilt the playing field a tad and tell you that my father always votes Republican and considers himself a christian.) His whole argument focused on how it just wasn't natural. He threw in how in the bible Adam and Eve were created, not Adam and Steve, gays can't have babies and numerous other reasons why gays should still be in the closet. I asked him if blacks should still be in the closet? In my eyes, gays are fighting some what the same battle that blacks fought not too very long ago. I told him I didn't have a problem with gays and he asked me how I got so liberal? I told him that gays were born that way, to which he remarked that they suffer from a form mental illness and what does society do with sick people? We put them away and treat them. I could tell that no matter what I told him, he wasn't changing his mind. The bible tells him it should be a certain way and that's it. I asked him if we should go back to stoning people like they did many years ago? Anyway, most of my dads frustrations deal with where he see's the world headed. Gays are just a part of what he see's as wrong doing. He used to argue with my friends, many years ago, telling them that we had to stop the Communists "over there" or they'd be knocking on our doors. What's funny is, he understands why the Mexicans are coming here. He says he'd do the same thing if he were in their shoes! You'd think he'd want to post the army on the border with sniper rifles!
I told him I had to agree with him, that he's probably seen some of the better times this country will possibly ever have. What I couldn't convince him of is that we're evolving and along the journey, we're gonna run into potholes and closed roads. I also see some things that make me go hmmmmm. Political correctness, for one, has gone screwy. Having paid attention for some 50 + years, I can say that there's more strife in the world today than ever before. There's way too much hatred in the name of someone's God. What I do know is this.......if you sit around and worry about 2 men or 2 women kissing, you're gonna miss the enjoyment you can find in life. I'm not sure what my dad will find time to let bother him next, but there will be something. I see US having an issue with Iran. Cross your fingers we don't! Hang in there dad, the journey isn't over!!
Most of you can probably guess what a person 85 years old might say. (Perhaps I should tilt the playing field a tad and tell you that my father always votes Republican and considers himself a christian.) His whole argument focused on how it just wasn't natural. He threw in how in the bible Adam and Eve were created, not Adam and Steve, gays can't have babies and numerous other reasons why gays should still be in the closet. I asked him if blacks should still be in the closet? In my eyes, gays are fighting some what the same battle that blacks fought not too very long ago. I told him I didn't have a problem with gays and he asked me how I got so liberal? I told him that gays were born that way, to which he remarked that they suffer from a form mental illness and what does society do with sick people? We put them away and treat them. I could tell that no matter what I told him, he wasn't changing his mind. The bible tells him it should be a certain way and that's it. I asked him if we should go back to stoning people like they did many years ago? Anyway, most of my dads frustrations deal with where he see's the world headed. Gays are just a part of what he see's as wrong doing. He used to argue with my friends, many years ago, telling them that we had to stop the Communists "over there" or they'd be knocking on our doors. What's funny is, he understands why the Mexicans are coming here. He says he'd do the same thing if he were in their shoes! You'd think he'd want to post the army on the border with sniper rifles!
I told him I had to agree with him, that he's probably seen some of the better times this country will possibly ever have. What I couldn't convince him of is that we're evolving and along the journey, we're gonna run into potholes and closed roads. I also see some things that make me go hmmmmm. Political correctness, for one, has gone screwy. Having paid attention for some 50 + years, I can say that there's more strife in the world today than ever before. There's way too much hatred in the name of someone's God. What I do know is this.......if you sit around and worry about 2 men or 2 women kissing, you're gonna miss the enjoyment you can find in life. I'm not sure what my dad will find time to let bother him next, but there will be something. I see US having an issue with Iran. Cross your fingers we don't! Hang in there dad, the journey isn't over!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)